Partly, and the honest answer is more interesting than a yes or a no. Randomization makes a lone identifier a poor long-term handle: you can't build a months-long profile of a stranger off one rotating address, which is exactly what it was designed to prevent. But random doesn't mean gone in seconds. Rotation runs on very different clocks: phone Bluetooth addresses rotate on roughly quarter-hour timers, randomized per-network Wi-Fi MACs persist for as long as the phone keeps using that network, and many accessories (watches, earbuds, trackers, fobs) rotate rarely or never. An identifier captured at 2pm is often still the same identifier at 6pm, and sometimes still the same identifier next month. What randomization really does is put a decaying shelf life on single identifiers, and the decay rate depends on the device.
That's why the system doesn't bet on any single identifier. It matches on the device cluster: everything a person consistently carries. A phone randomizes toward unknown networks, but the smartwatch paired to it, the earbuds in the pocket, the fitness tracker on the wrist, and the keyfob on the ring largely broadcast consistent identifiers, and even the phone itself emits stable signatures in its BLE traffic with paired accessories. Five signals with correlated timing across multiple visits is a fingerprint that one rotating MAC can't erase. Each additional consistent device raises the cluster confidence score; a lone unmatched identifier stays a low-confidence observation and is treated exactly that way.
What we promise, precisely: high-confidence matching against device clusters, honest confidence scoring on every event, and low-confidence events labeled as such rather than dressed up. What we do not promise: magic identification of a person carrying zero devices, or defeat of a sophisticated adversary who leaves everything at home. No proximity system can promise that, and the ones that imply it should worry you.
And randomization has a second act that most people, including most investigators, don't know about. The next section covers it.